Occupation guide · 13-1023.00
Purchasing agents: build a practical learning plan
Begin with the distinction between feasibility and preference. Read an offer’s pack and lead-time terms before comparing cost. Then practice an explicit scorecard and write down a question that would change the decision. These activities provide a useful learning plan even when a skill’s occupational rating is not the highest.
Purchase machinery, equipment, tools, parts, supplies, or services necessary for the operation of an establishment. Purchase raw or semifinished materials for manufacturing. May negotiate contracts.
First explore this role’s tasks →
Five skills connected to a concrete work product
These are selected learning options, not a complete ranking. Source importance runs from 1 to 5; source level runs from 0 to 7. The two scales describe different things and are not percentages or pass marks. Ratings describe an occupation, not your personal ability.
| Skill | Importance / 5 | Level / 7 | Source date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negotiation | 4.25 | 4.12 | 08/2025 · Analyst |
| Reading Comprehension | 4.12 | 4.12 | 08/2025 · Analyst |
| Critical Thinking | 3.88 | 3.88 | 08/2025 · Analyst |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 3.88 | 3.88 | 08/2025 · Analyst |
| Mathematics | 3.00 | 3.12 | 08/2025 · Analyst |
Write a learning action you can inspect
Choose one to three priorities. For each, name the work product, the next action, what would count as evidence and a review date. Keep your plan tied to a task rather than a rating alone.
By Friday, compare the three fictional quotes, explain the late offer’s exclusion and show the freight-inclusive cost of the chosen feasible order.
Negotiation
Bringing others together and trying to reconcile differences.
Try it here: Draft two supplier questions about lead time and freight that could change the feasible offer.
Reading Comprehension
Understanding written sentences and paragraphs in work-related documents.
Try it here: Extract the pack, minimum order and delivery promise from a quote.
Critical Thinking
Using logic and reasoning to identify the strengths and weaknesses of alternative solutions, conclusions, or approaches to problems.
Try it here: Separate a rejected late offer from an eligible offer that simply scores lower.
Judgment and Decision Making
Considering the relative costs and benefits of potential actions to choose the most appropriate one.
Try it here: Explain which published score weights caused the selected supplier to rank first.
Mathematics
Using mathematics to solve problems.
Try it here: Calculate landed order costs after rounding to accepted pack quantities.
Try related work
Compare supplier quotes after pack size and freight
You need at least 95 units within seven days. Compare the cost of feasible orders, including the supplier’s pack size and one freight charge.
Rank suppliers with published weights
A sourcing team has already scored three suppliers on the same 0–100 scale. Apply the agreed weights and explain why the highest price score does not win overall.
Calculate a reorder with reservations and late inbound stock
A buyer needs a replenishment quantity for three items. Work from usable stock at the cutoff, then round the shortage to full supplier packs.
Your worksheet stays in this page until you download it. It is not sent to a server. Refreshing the page clears unsaved notes.
Source and practice material
Occupational context uses the O*NET® 31.0 Database from the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, under CC BY 4.0. View the occupation.
Skill Workbench selected and adapted the occupational information and added its own fictional cases, calculations, guidance and worksheets. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed or tested these additions. O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA.